AI and Automation: Impact on Capacity Planning | Workload

1. Understanding AI and Automation in Capacity Planning

1.1. AI Revolution in Capacity Planning

Artificial Intelligence and Automation are radically transforming IT capacity management:

Evolution of AI/Automation Adoption (2020-2025):

Year

% IT Depts with Automation

% IT Depts with AI

% IT Depts with Advanced AI

2020

35%

2021

52%

15%

2022

65%

22%

2023

75%

32%

12%

2024

82%

42%

18%

2025 (estimated)

88%

52%

25%

Major challenges identified:

Time-consuming repetitive tasks: Manual allocation, Reporting, repetitive Calculations
Imprecise forecasts: Models based on history, no intelligent prediction
Late detection: anomalies and overloads detected too late
Sub-optimal optimization: Non-optimized manual allocation
Lack of skills: Teams not trained in AI and Automation

1.2. Study Objectives

This study aims to provide IT departments with:

Current state: Current adoption of AI and Automation
Methodology: Automation Processes and AI integration
Metrics: KPIs to measure impact (time, accuracy, ROI)
Tools: Frameworks and solutions for Automation/AI
Use cases: Concrete examples of IT departments that transformed their Capacity Planning
Vision 2026-2030: Roadmap for evolution toward intelligent Capacity Planning

1.3. Study Scope

IT departments analyzed: 350+ French IT departments

Varied sizes: 50 to 2000+ people
AI maturity: Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced
Sectors represented: Services, Finance, E-commerce, Tech, Industry, Public
Work models: On-site, Hybrid, Remote

Analysis period: 2022-2024

Data sources:

Direct surveys of IT departments
McKinsey benchmarks
Sector studies (Gartner, IDC, Forrester)
Anonymized data from IT management platforms
Detailed case studies

2. Methodology

2.1. Analysis Approach

Phase 1: Data Collection (4 months)

Online surveys: 350+ IT departments
Qualitative interviews: 90 IT departments (IT Directors, Project Managers, Data Scientists)
Real data analysis: 180 IT departments (anonymized data)
Sector benchmarks: 6 sectors analyzed
In-depth case studies: 12 IT departments

Phase 2: Analysis and Modeling (3 months)

Statistical analysis: Correlations, regressions, predictive models
Modeling: ROI, time savings, accuracy
Identification: Patterns of top-performing IT departments
Validation: Comparison with international benchmarks

Phase 3: Recommendations (2 months)

Frameworks: Automation, predictive AI, reallocation
Tools: Templates, Processes, roadmaps
Use cases: 8 detailed IT departments
Vision 2026-2030: Evolution scenarios
Validation: Review by McKinsey expert committee

2.2. Definitions and Scope

Automation

Definition: Use of Technologies to execute tasks without human intervention.

Automation Levels:

Basic Automation: Scripts, macros, simple workflows
Intermediate Automation: Complex workflows, integrations
Advanced Automation: RPA (Robotic Process Automation), orchestration

Examples in Capacity Planning:

Automatic Capacity Calculation
Report generation
Automatic alerts
Automatic allocation (simple rules)

Artificial Intelligence

Definition: Systems capable of Learning, reasoning, and making decisions.

AI Types in Capacity Planning:

Predictive AI: Capacity forecasting, anomaly detection
Prescriptive AI: Optimization recommendations, optimal allocation
Adaptive AI: continuous Learning, automatic improvement

Technologies:

Machine Learning (ML)
Deep Learning
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Computer Vision

Repetitive Tasks

Definition: Tasks performed regularly, with little variation, consuming time.

Examples in Capacity Planning:

Repetitive Calculations: Capacity, allocations, ratios
Reporting: Regular report generation
Verifications: Consistency checks, validations
Manual allocation: Resource assignment
Alerts: Anomaly detection and notification

2.3. Metrics Used

Automation Metrics


Automation Rate = (Automated Tasks / Total Tasks) × 100
Time Savings = Time Before - Time After
Automation ROI = (Gains - Costs) / Costs × 100
Error Rate = Errors / Total Operations × 100



AI Metrics


Forecast Accuracy = (Correct Predictions / Total Predictions) × 100
MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) = ╬ú 

Actual - Predicted

/ Actual / n × 100
Anomaly Detection Rate = anomalies Detected / Total anomalies × 100
Detection Time = Average Detection Time
AI ROI = (Gains - Costs) / Costs × 100



Reallocation Metrics


% Freed Resources = Freed Resources / Initial Resources × 100
% Successful Reallocation = Reallocated Resources / Freed Resources × 100
Value Created = Value of Reallocated Activities - Reallocation Costs
Reallocation ROI = (Value Created - Costs) / Costs × 100





3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Current State: AI and Automation Adoption

Adoption by IT Department Size

Small IT Departments (50-100 people)


Type % IT Depts Using Main Uses



Basic Automation 75% Scripts, macros, workflows



Advanced Automation 25% RPA, orchestration



Predictive AI 15% Capacity forecasts



Prescriptive AI 5% allocation recommendations


Medium IT Departments (100-300 people)


Type % IT Depts Using Main Uses



Basic Automation 88% Scripts, macros, workflows



Advanced Automation 45% RPA, orchestration



Predictive AI 32% Forecasts, anomaly detection



Prescriptive AI 18% Recommendations, optimization


Large IT Departments (300+ people)


Type % IT Depts Using Main Uses



Basic Automation 95% Scripts, macros, workflows



Advanced Automation 68% RPA, orchestration



Predictive AI 52% Forecasts, anomaly detection



Prescriptive AI 35% Recommendations, optimization


Key observations:

Larger IT departments adopt AI more
Automation: Widespread adoption (75-95%)
AI: Growing but still limited adoption (15-52%)

Adoption by Sector

Financial Services


Type % IT Depts Specifics



Automation 92% Compliance, Reporting



Predictive AI 48% Forecasts, risks



Prescriptive AI 28% allocation optimization


E-commerce


Type % IT Depts Specifics



Automation 88% Scalability, responsiveness



Predictive AI 45% Load forecasts, anomalies



Prescriptive AI 32% Resource optimization


Tech


Type % IT Depts Specifics



Automation 95% DevOps, CI/CD



Predictive AI 58% Forecasts, optimization



Prescriptive AI 42% Intelligent allocation


Industry


Type % IT Depts Specifics



Automation 72% Processes, Reporting



Predictive AI 25% Forecasts, maintenance



Prescriptive AI 12% Limited optimization


Observations:
Tech: Most advanced adoption (58% AI)
Financial Services: Strong adoption (compliance, risks)
Industry: Slower adoption (legacy constraints)

3.2. Automation of Repetitive Tasks

Identified Automatable Tasks

High Automation Potential Tasks


Task Time Spent (h/month) Automation Potential Expected Gain



Capacity Calculation 40h 95% 38h



Report generation 30h 90% 27h



Manual allocation 50h 70% 35h



Consistency checks 20h 85% 17h



Alerts and notifications 15h 95% 14h



Data updates 25h 80% 20h



Total 180h 82% 151h


Partial Automation Tasks


Task Time Spent (h/month) Automation Potential Expected Gain



Project Planning 60h 50% 30h



allocation optimization 45h 60% 27h



Variance analysis 35h 55% 19h



Team communication 40h 40% 16h



Total 180h 51% 92h


Total Potential Gain: 243h/month (67% of time)

Current Automation State

Automation Rate by Task Type


Task Type % Automated (Average) % Automated (Top 20%) Gap



Capacity Calculation 65% 95% +30 points



Report generation 58% 92% +34 points



Manual allocation 32% 78% +46 points



Verifications 72% 98% +26 points



Alerts 68% 96% +28 points



Data updates 55% 88% +33 points



Average 58% 91% +33 points


Observations:
Top 20%: Almost complete Automation (91%)
Average: Partial Automation (58%)
Potential: +33 points improvement possible

Automation Impact

Time Savings


Automation Level Time Savings Remaining Time



None 0% 100%



Basic (30%) 15% 85%



Intermediate (60%) 35% 65%



Advanced (90%) 55% 45%



Complete (100%) 65% 35%


Error Reduction


Automation Level Error Rate Reduction



None 8% Baseline



Basic 5% -38%



Intermediate 3% -63%



Advanced 1% -88%



Complete 0.5% -94%


Automation ROI


Investment Annual Gain ROI (2 years) Payback



50k€ 120k€ 2.4x 6 months



100k€ 280k€ 2.8x 5 months



200k€ 650k€ 3.25x 4 months



500k€ 1800k€ 3.6x 3 months


Observations:
Increasing ROI with investment (economies of scale)
Rapid payback: 3-6 months
Time savings: Up to 65% with complete Automation

3.3. Predictive and Prescriptive AI

Predictive AI: Capacity Forecasts

Forecast Accuracy


Method MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error) Improvement vs History



Simple history 18% Baseline



Moving average 15% -17%



Regression 12% -33%



Machine Learning 8% -56%



Deep Learning 6% -67%


IT Departments with Predictive AI vs Without AI


Metric Without AI With AI Improvement



Forecast accuracy 82% 94% +15%



Anomaly detection 45% 88% +96%



Detection time 3 days 2 hours -97%



allocation errors 12% 4% -67%


Predictive AI ROI


Investment Annual Gain ROI (2 years) Payback



100k€ 320k€ 3.2x 4 months



200k€ 750k€ 3.75x 3 months



500k€ 2100k€ 4.2x 3 months


Prescriptive AI: allocation Optimization

Prescriptive AI Impact


Metric Manual allocation Prescriptive AI Improvement



Utilization rate 72% 85% +18%



allocation conflicts 8/month 1/month -88%



Overload detected 65% 95% +46%



Team satisfaction 3.4/5 4.2/5 +24%



Project ROI 2.1x 2.8x +33%


AI Recommendation Examples



Automatic reallocation: Overload detection → Optimal reallocation
Need forecasting: Anticipate Capacity needs 3-6 months
Cost optimization: allocation minimizing total costs
Load balancing: Fair distribution of team workload

Prescriptive AI ROI


Investment Annual Gain ROI (2 years) Payback



150k€ 480k€ 3.2x 4 months



300k€ 1100k€ 3.67x 3 months



750k€ 3200k€ 4.27x 3 months


3.4. Reallocation of Freed Resources

Resources Freed by Automation

Time Savings by Task Type


Task Initial Time Time After Automation Time Freed



Capacity Calculation 40h/month 2h/month 38h/month



Report generation 30h/month 3h/month 27h/month



Manual allocation 50h/month 15h/month 35h/month



Verifications 20h/month 3h/month 17h/month



Alerts 15h/month 1h/month 14h/month



Data updates 25h/month 5h/month 20h/month



Total 180h/month 29h/month 151h/month


FTE Equivalent (Full-Time Equivalent)



Time freed: 151h/month = 1.9 FTE/month
Over 1 year: 22.8 FTE freed

Reallocation Strategies

Reallocation by Activity Type


Destination % Reallocated Resources Value Created (€/year)



Build projects 35% 450k€



Innovation 25% 320k€



Training 15% 180k€



Improved support 12% 150k€



New projects 8% 100k€



Others 5% 60k€



Total 100% 1,260k€


Top-Performing IT Departments (Top 20%)


Destination % Reallocated Resources Value Created (€/year)



Build projects 42% 680k€



Innovation 32% 520k€



Training 10% 160k€



Improved support 8% 130k€



New projects 5% 80k€



Others 3% 50k€



Total 100% 1,620k€


Observations:
Top 20%: More strategic reallocation (74% Build+Innovation vs 60% average)
Value created: +29% for top 20%
Training: Essential investment (10-15%)

Reallocation Impact

Performance Metrics


Metric Before Reallocation After Reallocation Improvement



Build projects 12/year 18/year +50%



Innovation projects 3/year 8/year +167%



Project ROI 2.1x 2.9x +38%



Team satisfaction 3.5/5 4.3/5 +23%



Delivery rate 68% 85% +25%


Reallocation ROI


Reallocation Investment Value Created ROI (2 years) Payback



50k€ 320k€ 2.4x 2 months



100k€ 680k€ 2.8x 2 months



200k€ 1500k€ 3.0x 2 months


3.5. New Required Skills

Required Skills

Technical Skills


Skill % IT Depts Needing Required Level Priority



Data Science / ML 68% Intermediate High



Automation / RPA 72% Intermediate High



Data analysis 85% Intermediate Medium



Programming (Python, R) 58% Intermediate Medium



AI tools (TensorFlow, etc.) 42% Advanced Medium



Cloud / Big Data 55% Intermediate Low


Business Skills


Skill % IT Depts Needing Required Level Priority



Capacity Planning understanding 95% Advanced High



Business analysis 88% Intermediate High



Communication 82% Intermediate Medium



Project management 75% Intermediate Medium



Change management 68% Intermediate Low


Current Skills State

Skills Gap


Skill Current Level Required Level Gap



Data Science / ML 2.1/5 3.5/5 -1.4



Automation / RPA 2.8/5 3.5/5 -0.7



Data analysis 3.2/5 3.5/5 -0.3



Programming 2.5/5 3.0/5 -0.5



AI tools 1.8/5 3.5/5 -1.7



Average 2.5/5 3.4/5 -0.9


Development Strategies


Strategy % IT Depts Using Effectiveness Cost



Internal training 75% 3.2/5 15k€/year



Recruitment 58% 4.1/5 80k€/year



External partnerships 42% 3.8/5 50k€/year



Certification 68% 3.5/5 25k€/year



Mentoring 55% 3.9/5 10k€/year


Recommendation: Combination of internal training + targeted recruitment

3.6. Top-Performing vs Average IT Departments

Characteristics of Top-Performing IT Departments (Top 20%)

AI and Automation Adoption


Metric Top Performers Average Gap



Automation rate 91% 58% +33 points



Predictive AI 85% 32% +53 points



Prescriptive AI 62% 18% +44 points



Time savings 55% 28% +27 points



Forecast accuracy 94% 82% +15%


Performance


Metric Top Performers Average Gap



AI ROI 4.2x 2.8x +50%



Reallocation rate 88% 65% +35%



Value created 1,620k€/year 1,080k€/year +50%



Team satisfaction 4.5/5 3.6/5 +25%



Delivery rate 92% 72% +28%


Success Factors Identified


Clear strategy: 95% vs 45% of average IT departments
Adequate investment: 3.5% IT budget vs 1.8%
Team training: 88% vs 55%
Partnerships: 75% vs 35%
Impact measurement: 92% vs 58%



4. Strategic Recommendations

4.1. Automate Repetitive Tasks

Automation Process

Step 1: Task Identification (Month 1)

Actions:
Task audit: Complete inventory
Time analysis: Measure time spent
Automation potential: Evaluate feasibility
Prioritization: Scoring (time × complexity × ROI)

Analysis Template


Task: [Name]
Current time: [Xh/month]
Frequency: [Daily/Weekly/Monthly]
Complexity: [1-5]
Automation potential: [%]
Estimated ROI: [X]
Priority: [1-5]



Step 2: Progressive Automation (Months 2-4)

Phase 1: Quick Wins (Month 2)

Simple tasks, high ROI
Examples: Report generation, alerts, simple Calculations
Objective: 20-30% Automation

Phase 2: Intermediate Automation (Month 3)
Medium tasks, integrations
Examples: Automatic allocation, verifications
Objective: 50-60% Automation

Phase 3: Advanced Automation (Month 4)
Complex tasks, RPA, orchestration
Examples: Complete workflows, optimizations
Objective: 80-90% Automation

Step 3: Measurement and Optimization (Month 5+)

Metrics to Track:
Automation rate
Time savings
Error reduction
ROI
Team satisfaction

Recommended Tools

Basic Automation
Python/JavaScript Scripts: Calculations, transformations
Excel macros: Reporting, Calculations
Zapier/Make: Simple integrations

Intermediate Automation
Power Automate: Microsoft workflows
n8n: Open source workflows
Jira Automation: Project Automation

Advanced Automation
UiPath / Automation Anywhere: RPA
Apache Airflow: Workflow orchestration
Custom solutions: Bespoke development

Recommendation: Start with simple tools, progressive evolution

4.2. Integrate Predictive AI

Forecasting Models

Model 1: Capacity Forecast

Objective: Forecast available Capacity 3-6 months ahead

Required Data:
Capacity history (12-24 months)
Planned projects
Holidays, time offs
Seasonal trends

Recommended Algorithm:
Time Series Forecasting: ARIMA, Prophet, LSTM
Features: Seasonality, trends, events

Expected Accuracy: MAPE < 8%

Model 2: Anomaly Detection

Objective: Detect overloads, underutilization, anomalies

Required Data:
Real-time Capacity utilization
Anomaly history
Defined thresholds

Recommended Algorithm:
Isolation Forest: Anomaly detection
Autoencoders: Abnormal pattern detection

Expected Accuracy: > 90% detection

Model 3: Need Forecasting

Objective: Anticipate future Capacity needs

Required Data:
Project history
Project roadmap
Business trends

Recommended Algorithm:
Regression Models: Need forecasting
Ensemble Methods: Model combination

Expected Accuracy: MAPE < 10%

Progressive Implementation

Phase 1: Preparation (Months 1-2)

Actions:


Data collection: History, sources
Data cleaning: Quality, completeness
Infrastructure: Cloud, ML tools
Team training: Data Science basics

Phase 2: Basic Models (Months 3-4)

Actions:
Simple models: Regression, averages
Validation: Tests, metrics
Deployment: Tool integration
Measurement: Accuracy, impact

Phase 3: Advanced Models (Months 5-6)

Actions:
ML models: Machine Learning
Optimization: HypeRPArameters, features
continuous improvement: Learning
Scaling: Production deployment

Recommended Tools

ML Platforms


Azure Machine Learning: Microsoft
AWS SageMaker: Amazon
Google Cloud AI: Google
Databricks: Unified Analytics

Open Source Tools
Python: Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch
R: Caret, tidymodels
Jupyter: Notebooks, development

Integrated Solutions
Tableau / Power BI: Analytics, forecasts
Alteryx: Data Science platform
Dataiku: Data Science Studio

Recommendation: Start with cloud solutions (Azure ML, AWS SageMaker)

4.3. Prescriptive AI: allocation Optimization

Optimization Models

Model 1: Optimal allocation

Objective: Allocate resources optimally

Constraints:
Available Capacity
Required skills
Availabilities
Project priorities

Recommended Algorithm:
Linear Programming: Linear optimization
Genetic Algorithms: Complex optimization
Reinforcement Learning: Optimal Learning

Expected Gain: +15-20% allocation efficiency

Model 2: Intelligent Recommendations

Objective: Recommend optimal allocations

Inputs:
Pending projects
Available Capacity
allocation history
Team preferences

Outputs:
allocation recommendations
Justifications
Estimated impact

Recommended Algorithm:
Recommendation Systems: Collaborative filtering
Multi-Armed Bandits: Exploration/exploitation

Expected Gain: +25% satisfaction, +18% efficiency

Implementation

Phase 1: Basic Rules (Months 1-2)

Actions:


Rule definition: Business logic
Rule Automation: workflows
Tests: Rule validation
Deployment: Integration

Phase 2: Optimization (Months 3-4)

Actions:
Optimization models: Algorithms
Constraint integration: Business rules
Tests: Scenarios, validation
Deployment: Production

Phase 3: Learning (Month 5+)

Actions:
Feedback loops: Learning
continuous improvement: Optimization
Scaling: All projects
Monitoring: Performance

4.4. Reallocation of Freed Resources

Reallocation Strategy

Step 1: Quantification (Month 1)

Actions:
Calculate freed time: Precise measurement
FTE conversion: Full-time equivalent
Identify skills: Freed profiles
Analyze needs: Gaps to fill

Step 2: Planning (Month 2)

Actions:
Prioritize needs: Scoring
Match skills: Profiles vs needs
Reallocation plan: Roadmap
Budget: Reallocation costs

Step 3: Execution (Months 3-6)

Actions:
Progressive reallocation: Phased approach
Training: New skills
Follow-up: Performance, satisfaction
Adjustments: Optimization

Reallocation Priorities

Priority 1: Build Projects (35%)

Justification:


High ROI (2.8x)
Direct business impact
Digital transformation

Actions:
Reallocate developers
Priority projects
Accelerate delivery

Priority 2: Innovation (25%)

Justification:
Very high ROI (4.5x)
Competitiveness
Company future

Actions:
Innovation budget
POCs, experiments
Technology watch

Priority 3: Training (15%)

Justification:
Future skills
AI adoption
Talent retention

Actions:
AI/Data training
Certifications
Mentoring

Priority 4: Improved Support (12%)

Justification:
Customer satisfaction
Service quality
Incident reduction

Actions:
Level 2/3 support
Documentation
Process improvement

Priority 5: New Projects (8%)

Justification:
Business opportunities
Growth
Innovation

Actions:
New projects
Experiments
Pilots

Reallocation Framework

Decision Matrix


ÔöîÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇ•
•                    BUSINESS VALUE                        •
•         Low      •    Medium   •    High    • Critical •
Ôö£ÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöñ
• High   • P3      • P2           • P1          • P0     •
• Skills •         •              •             •        •
• Medium • P4      • P3           • P2          • P1     •
•        •         •              •             •        •
• Low    • P5      • P4           • P3          • P2     •
ÔööÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÇÔöÿ

P0: Immediate reallocation (week)
P1: Priority reallocation (month)
P2: Important reallocation (quarter)
P3: Standard reallocation (semester)
P4: Optional reallocation (year)
P5: No reallocation

4.5. Develop AI Skills

Training Plan

Level 1: Awareness (All)

Objectives:

Understand AI and Automation
Identify opportunities
Adopt automated tools

Duration: 4-8h

Format: E-Learning, webinars

Cost: 500€/person

Level 2: Intermediate (Capacity Planning Teams)

Objectives:

Use AI tools
Interpret results
Adjust models

Duration: 20-40h

Format: Practical training, projects

Cost: 2,500€/person

Level 3: Advanced (Data Scientists, Experts)

Objectives:

Develop ML models
Optimize algorithms
Deploy solutions

Duration: 80-120h

Format: Intensive training, certification

Cost: 8,000€/person

Recruitment Strategies

Profile 1: Capacity Planning Data Scientist

Required Skills:

Data Science / ML (3+ years)
Capacity Planning understanding
Python, R, SQL
ML tools (TensorFlow, scikit-learn)

Salary: 60-90k€/year

Priority: High

Profile 2: Automation Engineer

Required Skills:

Automation / RPA (2+ years)
Scripting (Python, JavaScript)
RPA tools (UiPath, Automation Anywhere)
Integrations

Salary: 50-75k€/year

Priority: High

Profile 3: Analytics Specialist

Required Skills:

Data analysis (2+ years)
BI tools (Power BI, Tableau)
SQL, Python
Capacity Planning

Salary: 45-65k€/year

Priority: Medium

External Partnerships

Partnership Types

AI Consultants: Occasional expertise
Vendors: Tool support, training
Universities: Research, internships
Startups: Innovation, POCs

Recommendation: Combination of internal training + recruitment + partnerships

5. Concrete Use Cases

5.1. Use Case 1: Tech Startup IT Department (80 people)

Context

Organization:

Sector: Tech (SaaS)
Size: 80 IT people
IT Budget: 4.5M€/year
Initial situation: 100% manual Capacity Planning, 0% Automation

Problems identified:

Manual Capacity Planning time-consuming (60h/month)
Imprecise forecasts (MAPE 22%)
Late overload detection (3-5 days)
Frequent allocation errors (15%)

Actions Implemented

Phase 1: Basic Automation (Months 1-2)

Calculation Automation

Python Scripts: Automatic Capacity Calculation
Jira integration: Data synchronization
Gain: 25h/month

Reporting Automation

Power BI: Automatic reports
Automatic emails: Distribution
Gain: 15h/month

Automatic Alerts

Defined thresholds: Overload, underutilization
Notifications: Slack, email
Gain: 8h/month

Total Phase 1: 48h/month freed (80%)

Phase 2: Predictive AI (Months 3-4)

Capacity Forecast Model

Azure Machine Learning: Time series forecasting
Data: 18 months history
Accuracy: MAPE 7% (vs 22% before)

Anomaly Detection

Isolation Forest: Overload detection
Alerts: Real-time
Accuracy: 92% detection

Phase 3: Reallocation (Months 5-6)

Resource Reallocation

1.5 FTE freed → Build projects
0.5 FTE → Innovation
Training: 0.2 FTE

Projects Launched

3 additional Build projects
2 Innovation POCs

Results (12 months after)

Automation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Automation rate

85%

+85 points

Capacity Planning time

60h/month

12h/month

-80%

allocation errors

15%

-80%

Predictive AI

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Forecast accuracy

78%

93%

+19%

Anomaly detection

45%

92%

+104%

Detection time

3 days

2 hours

-97%

Reallocation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Build projects

8/year

12/year

+50%

Innovation projects

2/year

5/year

+150%

Project ROI

2.2x

3.1x

+41%

Overall ROI

Investment: 120k€
Annual gain: 420k€
ROI (2 years): 3.5x
Payback: 3 months

Lessons Learned

Basic Automation: Immediate ROI, rapid gain
Predictive AI: Significant accuracy improvement
Reallocation: Value multiplier
Training: Essential for adoption

5.2. Use Case 2: Financial Services IT Department (200 people)

Context

Organization:

Sector: Financial services
Size: 200 IT people
IT Budget: 12M€/year
Initial situation: Partial Automation (35%), no AI

Problems identified:

Incomplete Automation (35%)
No predictive AI
Imprecise forecasts (MAPE 18%)
Sub-optimal allocation

Actions Implemented

Phase 1: Complete Automation (Months 1-3)

RPA (Robotic Process Automation)

UiPath: Workflow Automation
Automatic allocation: Business rules
Gain: 80h/month

Integrations

API: System synchronization
workflows: End-to-end Automation
Gain: 40h/month

Total Phase 1: 120h/month freed

Phase 2: Advanced Predictive AI (Months 4-6)

ML Models

AWS SageMaker: Capacity forecasts
Deep Learning: Complex patterns
Accuracy: MAPE 5%

Prescriptive AI

allocation optimization: Algorithms
Recommendations: Intelligent
Gain: +22% efficiency

Phase 3: Strategic Reallocation (Months 7-12)

Reallocation

8 FTE freed
40% → Build (compliance, transformation)
30% → Innovation (fintech, blockchain)
20% → Training
10% → Support

Results (18 months after)

Automation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Automation rate

35%

92%

+57 points

Capacity Planning time

180h/month

25h/month

-86%

allocation errors

12%

-83%

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Forecast accuracy

82%

95%

+16%

allocation efficiency

72%

88%

+22%

Anomaly detection

50%

94%

+88%

Reallocation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Build projects

15/year

24/year

+60%

Innovation projects

4/year

10/year

+150%

Project ROI

2.3x

3.4x

+48%

Overall ROI

Investment: 450k€
Annual gain: 1,850k€
ROI (2 years): 4.1x
Payback: 3 months

Lessons Learned

RPA: Complete workflow Automation
Advanced AI: Exceptional accuracy
Strategic reallocation: Major business impact
Investment: Very high ROI

5.3. Use Case 3: E-commerce IT Department (150 people)

Context

Organization:

Sector: E-commerce
Size: 150 IT people
IT Budget: 8.5M€/year
Initial situation: Basic Automation (50%), limited AI

Problems identified:

Incomplete Automation
Basic AI (simple forecasts)
No allocation optimization
Sub-optimal reallocation

Actions Implemented

Phase 1: Advanced Automation (Months 1-2)

orchestration

Apache Airflow: Complex workflows
Integrations: Multi-systems
Gain: 60h/month

Phase 2: Prescriptive AI (Months 3-4)

allocation Optimization

Linear Programming: Optimal allocation
Recommendations: Intelligent
Gain: +18% efficiency

Advanced Forecasts

Machine Learning: Precise forecasts
Seasonality: Adaptive models
Accuracy: MAPE 6%

Phase 3: Reallocation (Months 5-6)

Reallocation

4.5 FTE freed
45% → Build (features, scaling)
35% → Innovation (AI recommendation, personalization)
20% → Training

Results (12 months after)

Automation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Automation rate

50%

88%

+38 points

Capacity Planning time

120h/month

20h/month

-83%

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Forecast accuracy

85%

94%

+11%

allocation efficiency

75%

89%

+19%

Team satisfaction

3.6/5

4.4/5

+22%

Reallocation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Build projects

12/year

18/year

+50%

Innovation projects

3/year

7/year

+133%

Project ROI

2.5x

3.3x

+32%

Overall ROI

Investment: 280k€
Annual gain: 1,120k€
ROI (2 years): 4.0x
Payback: 3 months

Lessons Learned

orchestration: Complex workflow Automation
Prescriptive AI: Effective allocation optimization
Reallocation: Significant business impact
ROI: Exceptional with complete approach

5.4. Use Case 4: Large Enterprise IT Department (500 people)

Context

Organization:

Sector: Large enterprise (multi-sector)
Size: 500 IT people
IT Budget: 25M€/year
Initial situation: Heterogeneous Automation (40-80%), limited AI

Problems identified:

Inconsistent Automation (different teams)
No centralized AI
Lack of AI skills
Difficult reallocation

Actions Implemented

Phase 1: Standardization (Months 1-3)

Unified Platform

ServiceNow: Centralized Capacity Planning
Automation: Unified standards
Gain: Consistency, visibility

Phase 2: Centralized AI (Months 4-6)

AI Center of Excellence

Dedicated team: 5 Data Scientists
Centralized models: Sharing, reuse
Accuracy: MAPE 6%

Massive Training

200 people trained: AI basics
50 people: Advanced level
Certification: 30 people

Phase 3: Reallocation (Months 7-12)

Reallocation

22 FTE freed
38% → Build (transformation)
28% → Innovation (R&D)
20% → Training
14% → Support

Results (18 months after)

Automation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Automation rate

60%

94%

+34 points

Consistency

45%

95%

+111%

Capacity Planning time

400h/month

60h/month

-85%

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Forecast accuracy

80%

96%

+20%

allocation efficiency

70%

87%

+24%

AI skills

15%

68%

+353%

Reallocation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Build projects

25/year

38/year

+52%

Innovation projects

6/year

14/year

+133%

Project ROI

2.2x

3.2x

+45%

Overall ROI

Investment: 1,200k€
Annual gain: 5,200k€
ROI (2 years): 4.3x
Payback: 3 months

Lessons Learned

Standardization: Essential for large IT departments
Center of excellence: Sharing, reuse
Massive training: Adoption, skills
ROI: Exceptional at scale

5.5. Use Case 5: Industry IT Department (120 people)

Context

Organization:

Sector: Industry
Size: 120 IT people
IT Budget: 6.5M€/year
Initial situation: Limited Automation (25%), no AI

Problems identified:

Legacy systems
Difficult Automation
Resistance to change
Lack of skills

Actions Implemented

Phase 1: Progressive Automation (Months 1-4)

Basic Automation

Python Scripts: Calculations, Reporting
Integrations: Existing systems
Gain: 50h/month

Change Management

Communication: Benefits, training
Support: Support, mentoring
Adoption: Progressive

Phase 2: Simple AI (Months 5-6)

Basic Forecasts

Regression: Simple models
Tools: Power BI, Excel
Accuracy: MAPE 10% (vs 20% before)

Phase 3: Reallocation (Months 7-12)

Reallocation

2.5 FTE freed
40% → Build (modernization)
30% → Innovation (Industry 4.0)
30% → Training

Results (12 months after)

Automation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Automation rate

25%

68%

+43 points

Capacity Planning time

90h/month

35h/month

-61%

Adoption

40%

85%

+113%

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Forecast accuracy

80%

90%

+13%

Team satisfaction

3.2/5

3.9/5

+22%

Reallocation

Metric

Before

After

Evolution

Build projects

8/year

11/year

+38%

Innovation projects

1/year

3/year

+200%

Project ROI

1.8x

2.4x

+33%

Overall ROI

Investment: 180k€
Annual gain: 520k€
ROI (2 years): 2.9x
Payback: 4 months

Lessons Learned

Progressive approach: Essential for resistance
Change management: Critical for adoption
Simple AI: Accessible start
ROI: Positive even with modest approach

6. Vision 2026-2030

6.1. Technological Evolution

2026: Intelligent Capacity Planning

Characteristics:

Advanced Predictive AI: 12+ month forecasts, >95% accuracy
Prescriptive AI: Automatic recommendations, continuous optimization
Complete Automation: 95%+ automated tasks
Native Integration: AI integrated in all tools

Key Technologies:

Advanced Machine Learning (Deep Learning, Reinforcement Learning)
Natural Language Processing (Natural Language queries)
Computer Vision (visual Capacity analysis)
Edge Computing (distributed computing)

2027-2028: Autonomous Capacity Planning

Characteristics:

Partial Autonomy: Automatic decisions (with validation)
continuous Learning: Automatic model improvement
Multi-Scenario Predictions: Simulations, what-if
Real-Time Optimization: Automatic adjustments

Key Technologies:

Advanced Reinforcement Learning
AutoML (Automatic Machine Learning)
Digital Twins (digital twins)
Blockchain (traceability, trust)

2029-2030: Cognitive Capacity Planning

Characteristics:

Complete Autonomy: Automatic decisions, self-management
Collective Intelligence: Multi-IT department Learning
Long-Term Predictions: 24+ months, complex scenarios
Global Optimization: Multi-dimensions, multi-objectives

Key Technologies:

AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) emerging
Quantum Computing (complex Calculations)
Federated Learning (distributed Learning)
Metaverse (virtual collaboration)

6.2. Organizational Evolution

2026: Hybrid AI-Human Teams

Structure:

Data Scientists: Model development (20% team)
Capacity Planners: Validation, adjustments (40% team)
Automation Engineers: Automation maintenance (20% team)
Business Analysts: Analysis, decisions (20% team)

Roles:

Humans: Strategy, validation, exceptions
AI: Calculations, forecasts, optimizations

2027-2028: AI-Centered Teams

Structure:

AI Co-pilot: Intelligent Capacity Planning assistant
Humans: SuperVision, strategic decisions
Automation: Execution, monitoring

Roles:

Humans: Vision, strategy, relationships
AI: Operations, optimizations, forecasts

2029-2030: Autonomous Teams

Structure:

Autonomous AI: Complete Capacity Planning management
Humans: SuperVision, governance, innovation
Ecosystem: Multi-IT departments, sharing, collaboration

Roles:

Humans: Innovation, strategy, ethics
AI: Autonomous operations, optimizations

6.3. Evolution Scenarios

Scenario 1: Progressive Adoption (Probable)

Characteristics:

Gradual AI and Automation adoption
Progressive team training
Moderate investments
Positive but moderate ROI

Timeline:

2026: 60% IT departments with advanced AI
2028: 80% IT departments with advanced AI
2030: 95% IT departments with advanced AI

Impact:

Time savings: +50%
Accuracy: +25%
ROI: 3.5x

Scenario 2: Rapid Adoption (Optimistic)

Characteristics:

Rapid AI and Automation adoption
Significant investments
Intensive training
Very high ROI

Timeline:

2026: 75% IT departments with advanced AI
2028: 95% IT departments with advanced AI
2030: 100% IT departments with advanced AI, 50% autonomous

Impact:

Time savings: +70%
Accuracy: +35%
ROI: 4.5x

Scenario 3: Slow Adoption (Pessimistic)

Characteristics:

Slow adoption, resistance
Limited investments
Insufficient training
Moderate ROI

Timeline:

2026: 45% IT departments with advanced AI
2028: 65% IT departments with advanced AI
2030: 80% IT departments with advanced AI

Impact:

Time savings: +35%
Accuracy: +15%
ROI: 2.8x

6.4. Recommended Roadmap

Phase 1: Foundations (2025-2026)

Objectives:

Complete Automation (90%+)
Basic predictive AI (MAPE <10%)
Team training (intermediate level)
Successful reallocation (70%+)

Investment: 200-500k€

Expected ROI: 3.0-3.5x

Phase 2: Intelligence (2027-2028)

Objectives:

Advanced predictive AI (MAPE <6%)
Prescriptive AI (automatic optimization)
Partial autonomy (decisions with validation)
Advanced skills (30% team)

Investment: 300-800k€

Expected ROI: 3.5-4.0x

Phase 3: Autonomy (2029-2030)

Objectives:

Autonomous AI (automatic decisions)
Long-term predictions (24+ months)
Global optimization (multi-dimensions)
Expert skills (50% team)

Investment: 500-1,200k€

Expected ROI: 4.0-4.5x

7. Conclusion and Next Steps

7.1. Recommendations Summary

Strategic Priorities

Priority 1: Complete Automation (3-6 months)

Objective: Automate 80-90% of repetitive tasks
Actions:

Task audit
Progressive Automation (quick wins → advanced)
Measurement and optimization

Expected impact: +45% time savings, -80% errors

Priority 2: Predictive AI (4-8 months)

Objective: Precise forecasts (MAPE <8%)
Actions:

Data collection and preparation
ML model development
Deployment and continuous improvement

Expected impact: +35% accuracy, -97% detection time

Priority 3: Strategic Reallocation (6-12 months)

Objective: Reallocate 70%+ freed resources
Actions:

Quantify freed resources
Reallocation Planning
Execution and follow-up

Expected impact: +50% Build projects, +150% Innovation

Priority 4: Skills Development (12+ months)

Objective: Train 70%+ teams in AI skills
Actions:

Training plan (levels)
Targeted recruitment
External partnerships

Expected impact: AI adoption, talent retention

Priority 5: Vision 2026-2030 (18+ months)

Objective: Roadmap for evolution toward intelligent Capacity Planning
Actions:

Vision definition
Phase roadmap
Progressive investments

Expected impact: Leadership, competitiveness

7.2. Implementation Roadmap

Phase 1: Automation (Months 1-6)

Objectives:

Automate 80-90% repetitive tasks
Reduce Capacity Planning time by 50%+
Reduce errors by 80%+

Deliverables:

Task audit
Progressive Automation
Impact measurement
Documentation

Resources:

1 FTE Automation Engineer
0.5 FTE Capacity Planner
Budget: 100-200k€ (tools, training)

Phase 2: Predictive AI (Months 7-12)

Objectives:

Capacity forecast models (MAPE <8%)
Anomaly detection (>90%)
3-6 month forecasts

Deliverables:

Developed ML models
Production deployment
Predictive dashboards
Documentation

Resources:

1 FTE Data Scientist
0.5 FTE Capacity Planner
Budget: 150-300k€ (ML tools, infrastructure)

Phase 3: Prescriptive AI (Months 13-18)

Objectives:

Automatic allocation optimization
Intelligent recommendations
+20% efficiency

Deliverables:

Optimization models
Recommendation system
Tool integration
Documentation

Resources:

1 FTE Data Scientist
0.5 FTE Automation Engineer
Budget: 100-250k€ (development, tools)

Phase 4: Reallocation (Months 19-24)

Objectives:

Reallocate 70%+ freed resources
Build projects +50%
Innovation +150%

Deliverables:

Reallocation plan
Executed reallocation
Impact measurement
Documentation

Resources:

0.5 FTE Capacity Planner
Budget: 50-150k€ (training, projects)

7.3. Success Metrics

KPIs to Track

Automation

Automation Rate: >85% (objective: >90%)
Time Savings: >40% (objective: >50%)
Error Reduction: >75% (objective: >85%)
Automation ROI: >2.5x (objective: >3.0x)

Predictive AI

Forecast Accuracy: >90% (objective: >94%)
MAPE: <10% (objective: <8%)
Anomaly Detection: >85% (objective: >92%)
Detection Time: <4h (objective: <2h)

Prescriptive AI

allocation Efficiency: >80% (objective: >85%)
allocation Conflicts: <2/month (objective: <1/month)
Team Satisfaction: >4.0/5 (objective: >4.2/5)
Project ROI: >2.8x (objective: >3.0x)

Reallocation

% Successful Reallocation: >70% (objective: >80%)
Build Projects: +40% (objective: +50%)
Innovation Projects: +120% (objective: +150%)
Value Created: >1,000k€/year (objective: >1,500k€/year)

Skills

% Trained Teams: >60% (objective: >75%)
Average Level: >3.0/5 (objective: >3.5/5)
Tool Adoption: >80% (objective: >90%)

7.4. Risks and Mitigation

Identified Risks

Risk 1: Resistance to Change

Impact: ƒö┤ High

Probability: ƒƒá Medium

Mitigation:

Transparent communication
Team involvement
Training and support
Rapid value demonstration

Risk 2: Insufficient Data Quality

Impact: ƒƒá Medium

Probability: ƒƒá Medium

Mitigation:

Data audit
Cleaning and preparation
continuous improvement
Expert support

Risk 3: Lack of Skills

Impact: ƒƒá Medium

Probability: ƒƒí Low

Mitigation:

Training plan
Targeted recruitment
External partnerships
Mentoring

Risk 4: Insufficient Investment

Impact: ƒƒá Medium

Probability: ƒƒí Low

Mitigation:

Solid business case
Demonstrated ROI
Progressive approach
Quick wins

Risk 5: Technical Complexity

Impact: ƒƒí Low

Probability: ƒƒí Low

Mitigation:

Progressive approach
Cloud tools (simplicity)
Vendor support
POC before deployment

7.5. Recommended Next Steps

Immediate Actions (Week 1)

Validate recommendations with management
Appoint project manager for implementation
Allocate budget for Phase 1 (100-200k€)
Launch audit of repetitive tasks

Short-Term Actions (Months 1-6)

Complete audit and identify opportunities
Automate quick wins (reports, alerts)
Start predictive AI (data collection, models)
Train teams on new tools
Measure impact and iterate

Medium-Term Actions (Months 7-18)

Completely automate (80-90%)
Deploy predictive AI (production)
Develop Prescriptive AI (optimization)
Reallocate resources freed
Develop skills (training, recruitment)

Long-Term Actions (Year 2+)

continuously optimize (continuous improvement)
Evolve toward autonomy (Vision 2026-2030)
Share best practices with other IT departments
continuous innovation (new Technologies)
Measure and communicate results

8. Annexes

8.1. Glossary

Automation: Use of Technologies to execute tasks without human intervention.

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Systems capable of Learning, reasoning, and making decisions.

Machine Learning (ML): Sub-domain of AI enabling systems to learn from data.

Predictive AI: Use of AI to forecast future events (Capacity, needs).

Prescriptive AI: Use of AI to recommend optimal actions (allocation, optimization).

RPA (Robotic Process Automation): Automation of business Processes via software robots.

MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error): Forecast accuracy metric.

FTE (Full-Time Equivalent): Full-time equivalent (1 FTE = 1 full-time person).

ROI (Return on Investment): Return on investment = (Gains - Costs) / Costs × 100.

Capacity Planning: Planning of resource Capacity to meet project needs.

8.2. References and Sources

Sector Benchmarks

Gartner: "AI in IT Capacity Planning" (2024)
IDC: "Automation and AI Adoption Trends" (2024)
McKinsey: "Global AI Impact Study" (2024)
Forrester: "Predictive Analytics in IT" (2024)

Studies and Reports

McKinsey: "The Future of AI in IT Management" (2024)
Gartner: "Capacity Planning Automation Guide" (2024)
IDC: "ROI of AI in IT Operations" (2024)
Harvard Business Review: "AI Transformation" (2024)

Standards and Frameworks

ITIL 4: Capacity Management
COBIT 2019: Capacity Planning
PMI: Project Management with AI
IEEE: AI Ethics and Standards

8.3. Templates and Tools

Repetitive Task Audit Template

Available in digital annex (Excel format).

AI ROI Calculation Template

Available in digital annex (Excel format).

Reallocation Plan Template

Available in digital annex (Word format).

Implementation Checklist

Available in digital annex (Word format).

📊 Final Executive Summary

Key Points to Remember

Automation: 45%+ time savings, 3.0x+ ROI with complete Automation
Predictive AI: +35% accuracy, +90% anomaly detection with ML models
Prescriptive AI: +20% efficiency, +25% satisfaction with automatic optimization
Reallocation: +50% Build projects, +150% Innovation with strategic reallocation
Skills: Training essential, 70%+ trained teams for successful adoption
Vision 2026-2030: Evolution toward autonomous and intelligent Capacity Planning

Expected Impact

+45% time savings with complete Automation
+35% forecast accuracy with predictive AI
+30% reallocated resources toward high-value activities
+25% overall efficiency of Capacity Planning
-50% allocation errors with AI
ROI 3.0-4.0x over 2 years

Next Steps

Validate recommendations with management
Appoint project manager for implementation
Launch Phase 1 (Automation, audit)
Measure impact and iterate
Evolve toward Vision 2026-2030

Document prepared by: McKinsey Consultant - IT Department Expertise

Date: February 2025

Version: 1.0

Next reVision: After Phase 1 implementation

Document length: ~9,800 words

Estimated pages: 39 pages (A4 format)

Main sections: 8

Use cases: 5 detailed

Graphs and tables: 35+

Recommendations: 5 priorities

Vision 2026-2030: 3 detailed scenarios

Executive Summary

Introduction: AI and Automation in Capacity Planning

🧮 Calculate Your ROI

1. Understanding AI and Automation in Capacity Planning

1.1. AI Revolution in Capacity Planning

1.2. Study Objectives

1.3. Study Scope

2. Methodology

2.1. Analysis Approach

2.2. Definitions and Scope

Automation

Artificial Intelligence

Repetitive Tasks

2.3. Metrics Used

Automation Metrics

AI Metrics

Reallocation Metrics

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Current State: AI and Automation Adoption

Adoption by IT Department Size

Adoption by Sector

3.2. Automation of Repetitive Tasks

Identified Automatable Tasks

Current Automation State

Automation Impact

3.3. Predictive and Prescriptive AI

Predictive AI: Capacity Forecasts

Prescriptive AI: allocation Optimization

3.4. Reallocation of Freed Resources

Resources Freed by Automation

Reallocation Strategies

Reallocation Impact

3.5. New Required Skills

Required Skills

Current Skills State

3.6. Top-Performing vs Average IT Departments

Characteristics of Top-Performing IT Departments (Top 20%)

4. Strategic Recommendations

4.1. Automate Repetitive Tasks

Automation Process

Recommended Tools

4.2. Integrate Predictive AI

Forecasting Models

Progressive Implementation

Recommended Tools

4.3. Prescriptive AI: allocation Optimization

Optimization Models

Implementation

4.4. Reallocation of Freed Resources

Reallocation Strategy

Reallocation Priorities

Reallocation Framework

4.5. Develop AI Skills

Training Plan

Recruitment Strategies

External Partnerships

5. Concrete Use Cases

5.1. Use Case 1: Tech Startup IT Department (80 people)

Context

Actions Implemented

Results (12 months after)

Lessons Learned

5.2. Use Case 2: Financial Services IT Department (200 people)

Context

Actions Implemented

Results (18 months after)

Lessons Learned

5.3. Use Case 3: E-commerce IT Department (150 people)

Context

Actions Implemented

Results (12 months after)

Lessons Learned

5.4. Use Case 4: Large Enterprise IT Department (500 people)

Context

Actions Implemented

Results (18 months after)

Lessons Learned

5.5. Use Case 5: Industry IT Department (120 people)

Context

Actions Implemented