Workload or Jira Tempo for capacity planning?
Tempo fits if all planning lives in Jira and you only need Jira time/resource tracking. Workload fits if you are a CIO office with multiple sources (Jira, Azure DevOps, CSV), need global capacity view, conflict detection, and executive reporting — with Tempo sync from the Professional plan.
Features by plan
Jira Tempo, Azure DevOps, and Toggl integrations from the Professional plan
The Starter plan includes the full trial and CSV import; native integrations start on Professional.
Compare plans →Workload vs Jira Tempo
Tempo is the timesheet/resource module in the Jira ecosystem. Workload is a CIO capacity platform with Tempo sync — portfolio view, conflicts, and KPIs beyond Jira alone.
Last updated :
Workload is for you if…
- You want a multi-project CIO capacity view (not Jira-only)
- You must detect overload and allocation conflicts
- You combine Jira + other tools or non-Jira teams
- You want CIO KPIs and portfolio what-if scenarios
- You keep Tempo for timesheets and Workload for capacity
Jira Tempo is enough if…
- 100% of projects and teams are in Jira
- Primary need is timesheets and Jira capacity board
- You already run Atlassian suite and want no extra tool
- No cross-tool CIO reporting or multi-source portfolio
Frequently asked questions
Does Workload replace Jira Tempo?
Not necessarily. Workload integrates Tempo to sync actuals (timesheets) with planned capacity. Many customers keep Tempo for entry and Workload for capacity planning and conflicts.
Do I need Jira to use Workload?
No. Workload works standalone with CSV import on Starter. Jira Tempo and Azure DevOps integrations are available from the Professional plan.
How does Workload pricing compare to Tempo?
Tempo is billed per Atlassian user as a Jira add-on. Workload is capacity planning SaaS from $59/month with a 14-day trial — CIO-focused, not Jira-team-only.